【简答题】影响,感染力,势力,权势 n. 影响,感化 v.
【单选题】关于肾脏描述错误的是()
C.
周围被膜分为三层,依次为纤维囊、脂肪囊和肾筋膜
【单选题】In which sentence the underlined word has different meaning?
A.
Some hostages were swapped for convicted prisoners.
B.
He put both hands flat on the door and pushed as hard as he could.
C.
The bodyguards thrust past the crowd to get at the cameraman.
D.
He was then shoved face down on the pavement by the policeman.
【多选题】以下事项属于注册会计师制订具体审计计划时应当考虑的内容的有()。
B.
对销售业务流程内部控制的了解、评价以及设计的拟实施控制测试性质、时间安排和范围
D.
对被审计单位重要会计估计事项进行职业判断,必要时考虑利用专家工作
【多选题】计划审计工作时应当考虑的事项有( )。
B.
可获取的、与内部控制有效性相关的证据的类型和范围
D.
重要性、风险等与确定内部控制重大缺陷相关的因素
【单选题】我国的法人设立中,不可采用的原则是:( )
【判断题】判断题:“在物流质量管理上存在这样的事实,即绝大多数的物流工作是在监督者的视线外完成的。”A. 对 B. 错
【单选题】根据下面资料,回答下列各题。 Many bankers may be worried about whether some fancy product dreamed up might yet lead to a visit from the police. Daniel Dantas, a financier, who has profited by operating at the middl...
A.
A crime quite experienced and tactful.
B.
A crime by operating at the middle place.
C.
A crime attempting to temper police to work for him.
D.
A crime in money-laundering.
【单选题】In the case of International Primate Protection League vs Institute for Behavioral Research in the US, what of the following events never happened?
A.
In 1981, a graduate student & PETA member, Alex Pacheco, volunteered at a research center in Silver Spring, Maryland. At the time, Edward Taub was conducting research on monkeys for neuroplasticity purposes at that center.
B.
While Alex spent time at the research center, he noticed the inhumane treatment of the monkeys under the AWA and reported it to the police. He filed suit against Edward Taub, who was researching afferent ganglia. Edward Taub was convicted of six animal cruelty charges, which were appealed in the second trial. They proved to be significant in the understanding of the law.
C.
While this case provided an advancement in neurology research, it was at risking inhumane treatment of animals. As the court wrote in its opinion: "To imply a cause of action in these plaintiffs might entail serious consequences. It might open the use of animals in biomedical research to the hazards and vicissitudes of courtroom litigation. It may draw judges into the supervision and regulation of laboratory research. It might unleash a spate of private lawsuits that would impede advances made by medical [sic] science in the alleviation of human suffering. To risk consequences of this magnitude in the absence of clear direction from the Congress would be ill-advised. In fact, we are persuaded that Congress intended that the independence of medical research be respected and that administrative enforcement govern the Animal Welfare Act."
D.
The trial for this case was conducted in the UK.