What is the implication of the dilemma of trust?
A.
We believe everything the other says and can be manipulated by their dishonesty.
B.
We do not believe anything the other says and therefore are immune to their dishonesty.
C.
We tell the other party our exact requirements and limits in negotiation, and therefore we will never do better than this minimum level.
D.
We never reveal our requirements and limits in negotiation, and therefore are able to far exceed that minimum level.
E.
None of the above describes the implication of the dilemma of trust.