皮皮学,免费搜题
登录
logo - 刷刷题
搜题
【单选题】
Shortly after dawn on February 17th 2003, the world's most ambitious road pricing experiment will start in London. Though cordon toll schemes have been operating in Norway for years, and Singapore has an electronic system, no one has ever tried to charge motorists in a city of the size and complexity of London. For decades, transport planners have been demanding that motorists should pay directly for the use of roads. According to the professionals, it is the only way of civilizing cities and restraining the growth of inter urban traffic. Politicians have mostly turned a deaf ear, fearing that charging for something what was previously free was a quick route to electoral suicide. But London's initiative suggests that the point where road pricing becomes generally accepted as the most efficient way to restrain traffic is much nearer than most drivers realize. The mayor of London, Ken Livingstone, has pinned his political reputation on the scheme's success. If it works, cities around the world will rush to copy it. If it fails, he will be jeered from office when he seeks re-election in 2004. But how will success be judged? The mayor claims that congestion charging will produce £130m in net annual revenues, reduce traffic in central London by 15% and reduce traffic delays by about a quarter. Unfortunately these ambitious targets are unlikely to be met. For a start, the low level at which the charge has been set owes more to politics than traffic planning. Its impact, modest in comparison with the already high £4 an hour on-street parking charges in the area, may be less than anticipated. But most transport experts are cautiously optimistic that it will help improve the capital's chaotic transport system. As for the mayor, his political prospects look good. Those who drive cars in the center of London during the day are a tiny fraction of the millions who walk or use public transport to get to work. London's willingness to take the plunge has moved congestion charging from the realm of transport planners into mainstream politics. Yet the low-tech solution it has adopted has been overtaken by modern microwave radio systems allowing cars to communicate with roadside charging units. The next generation of technology will use global positioning satellites (GPS) to track the position of vehicles wherever they are, on a second-to- second basis. The brave new world of paying as you go is not far away. For those who drive in rural areas, the cost will come down. But for motorists who spend most of their time in congested urban areas, travel is rightly going to become much more expensive. We can learn from the first paragraph that in the world the scheme of tolling systems is
A.
out of the question.
B.
anything but new.
C.
for the sake of safety.
D.
nowhere near success.
手机使用
分享
复制链接
新浪微博
分享QQ
微信扫一扫
微信内点击右上角“…”即可分享
反馈
参考答案:
举一反三
【单选题】关于电工电子技术,正确的是()。
A.
分为电工技术和电子技术两部分
B.
电工技术研究电能的传输和转换(强电)
C.
电子技术研究信号的传递和处理(弱电)
D.
都正确
【单选题】下面说法正确的是,电工学课程讲解的内容 ,B.只有电子技术,C.电工技术和电子技术,D.只有交流电。
A.
只有电工技术
B.
只有电子技术
C.
电工技术和电子技术,
D.
只有交流电。
【单选题】电工技术和电子技术的区别是什么?
A.
电工技术就是强电,对人体有伤害;电子技术就是弱电,对人体无伤害。
B.
电工技术关注能量的传输与利用,电子技术关注信号的传递与处理。
C.
电工技术就是电学的基础知识,电子技术是更高深的知识。
D.
电工技术是统称,电子技术是电工技术的一部分。
【多选题】不属于新生儿重度窒息的临床表现是
A.
心跳规律,心率110次/分
B.
对外界刺激无反应
C.
喉反射存在
D.
呼吸表浅或不规则
【单选题】有甲、乙、两、丁、戊5只猫。其中甲、乙、丙都是短毛猫,丁和戊都是长毛猫,甲、乙为雌猫,其余为雄猫。甲和戊的后代全是短尾猫,乙和丁的后代有长毛也有短毛。欲测定丙猫的基因型,最好选择()
A.
甲猫
B.
乙猫
C.
丁猫
D.
戊猫
【单选题】新生儿重度窒息的临床表现是
A.
心率110次/分
B.
对外界刺激无反应
C.
全身皮肤呈青紫色
D.
呼吸表浅或不规律
E.
肌张力好,四肢稍屈
【单选题】下列技术不属于电工新技术的是( )
A.
火力发电
B.
超导电工
C.
核聚变
D.
磁悬浮列车
【单选题】新生儿重度窒息的临床表现是()
A.
头先露羊水中混有胎粪
B.
新生儿心率<80/min
C.
新生儿呼吸表浅或不规则
D.
胎心130/min
E.
新生儿心率130/min
【单选题】有甲、乙、丙、丁、戊5只猫。其中甲乙丙都是短毛猫,丁和戊是长毛猫,甲乙为雌猫,其余是雄猫。甲和戊的后代全是短毛猫,乙和丁的后代,长毛和短毛小猫均有,欲测定丙猫的基因型,最好选择
A.
甲猫
B.
乙猫
C.
丁猫
D.
戊猫
【单选题】新生儿重度窒息的临床表现是:
A.
心跳规律,心率110次/分
B.
对外界刺激无反应
C.
喉反射存在
D.
呼吸表浅或不规则
E.
肌张力好,四肢稍屈
相关题目:
参考解析:
知识点:
题目纠错 0
发布
创建自己的小题库 - 刷刷题