皮皮学,免费搜题
登录
logo - 刷刷题
搜题
【简答题】
任务型阅读 (共10小题;每小题1分,满分10分) 请认真阅读下列短文,并根据所读内容在文章后表格中的空格里填入一个最恰当的单词。 注意:每个空格只填1个单词。请将答案写在答题卡上相应题号的横线上。 Waste to Energy—JUST BURN IT! WHY BURN WASTE? Waste-to-energy plants generate (产生) enough electricity to supply 2.4 million households in the US. But, providing electricity is not the major advantage of waste-to-energy plants. In fact, it costs more to generate electricity at a waste-to-energy plant than it does at a coal, nuclear, or hydropower plant. The major advantage of burning waste is that it considerably reduces the amount of trash going to landfills. The average American produces more than 1,600 pounds of waste a year. If all this waste were landfilled, it would take more than two cubic yards of landfill space. That’s the volume of a box three feet long, three feet wide, and six feet high. If that waste were burned, the ashes would fit into a box three feet long, three feet wide, but only nine inches high! Some communities in the Northeast may be running out of land for new landfills. And, since most people don’t want landfills in their backyards, it has become more difficult to obtain permits to build new landfills. Taking the country as a whole, the United States has plenty of open space, of course, but it is expensive to transport garbage a long distance to put it into a landfill. TO BURN OR NOT TO BURN? Some people are concerned that burning garbage may harm the environment. Like coal plants, waste-to-energy plants produce air pollution when the fuel is burned to produce steam or electricity. Burning garbage releases the chemicals and substances found in the waste. Some chemicals can be a threat to people, the environment, or both, if they are not properly controlled. Some critics of waste-to-energy plants are afraid that burning waste will hamper (妨碍,阻碍) recycling programs. If everyone sends their trash to a waste-to-energy plant, they say, there will be little motive to recycle. Several states have considered or are considering banning waste-to-energy plants unless recycling programs are in place. Massachusetts, New Jersey, and New York City have delayed new waste-to-energy plants, hoping to increase the level of recycling first. So, what’s the real story? Can recycling and burning waste coexist? At first glance, recycling and waste-to-energy seem to be at odds (不一致), but they can actually complement (弥补) each other. That’s because it makes good sense to recycle some materials, and better sense to burn others. Let’s look at aluminum, for example. Aluminum mineral is so expensive to mine that recycling aluminum more than pays for itself. Burning it produces no energy. So clearly, aluminum is valuable to recycle and not useful to burn. Paper, on the other hand, can either be burned or recycled—it all depends on the price the used paper will bring. Plastics are another matter. Because plastics are made from petroleum and natural gas, they are excellent sources of energy for waste-to-energy plants. This is especially true since plastics are not as easy to recycle as steel, aluminum, or paper. Plastics almost always have to be hand sorted and making a product from recycled plastics may cost more than making it from new materials. To burn or not to burn is not really the question. We should use both recycling and waste-to-energy as alternatives to landfilling. Waste to Energy—JUST BURN IT! WHY BURN WASTE? Advantages of waste to Energy ◆Though at a high (71) _______, waste-to-energy plants can produce enough electricity for 2.4 million US households. ◆Burning waste can (72) _______ a considerable amount of trash going to landfills. (73)_______ for landfilling ◆Some communities (74) _______ land for new landfills. ◆Most people refuse to build landfills around. ◆Building landfills in far-away areas will increase the cost of (75) _______ garbage. TO BURN OR NOT TO BURN? (76) __________ about burning garbage ◆Burning garbage releases chemicals, which, if not properly controlled, can be (77) _______ to people and the environment. ◆Burning garbage will hamper recycling programs. Coexistence of recycling and burning waste Recycling and waste-to-energy can go well with each other in that some materials like aluminum are fit to recycle, while others like plastics are fit to (78) _______. (79)__________ Whether to burn or not to burn, we should (80) _______ landfilling with both recycling and waste-to-energy to deal with garbage.
手机使用
分享
复制链接
新浪微博
分享QQ
微信扫一扫
微信内点击右上角“…”即可分享
反馈
参考答案:
举一反三
【多选题】根据以下内容,回答下列各题。 2003年12月,深圳飞达进出口公司向深圳海关申报出口一批“阿迪达斯”牌运动服(该品牌已于2000年向海关总署就“阿迪达斯”商标申请过知识产权备案),该批货物价值为25万元。查验当天,阿迪达斯公司中华区总负责人称该货物为假冒伪劣商品,向深圳海关申请扣留了该批货物。经过海关工作人员的调查,认定飞达进出口公司的“阿迪达斯”牌运动服均为假冒伪劣产品,侵犯了阿迪达斯公司的商标...
A.
知识产权权利人的名称或姓名,注册地或国籍
B.
知识产权的名称、内容及相关信息
C.
该知识产权的许可行使状况
D.
合法使用该知识产权的货物名称、产地、进出口商、主要特征等
【单选题】《古诗为焦仲卿妻作》的女主人公是 _________ 。
A.
秦罗敷
B.
刘兰芝
C.
婵娟
D.
莺莺
【多选题】可以向我国海关申请备案保护的知识产权包括
A.
商标专用权
B.
著作权和与著作权有关的权利
C.
专利权
D.
奥林匹克标志专有权
【单选题】《古诗为焦仲卿妻作》中的女主人公是
A.
王昭君
B.
秦罗敷
C.
焦仲卿
D.
刘兰芝
【多选题】2004年2月,广州宝丰贸易公司向黄浦海关中报出口一批“耐克”牌运动鞋(美国耐克公司已于1999年向海关总署就“耐克”商标中请过知识产权备案)。申报当天美国耐克(中国)公司称该货物为假冒商品,向黄浦海关中请扣留了该批货物。经过黄浦海关工作人员的查验,宝丰公司的“耐克”运动鞋均为假冒伪劣产品,侵犯了耐克公司的商标专用权,海关依法对该公司进行了处罚,没收了该批货物。 根据上述案例,选择回答下列问题: ...
A.
“耐克”商标权利人的名称或姓名,注册地或国籍
B.
商标的名称内容及相关信息
C.
该商标的许可行使状况
D.
合法使用该商标的货物名称、产地、进出口商、主要特征等
【多选题】2008年2月,广州宝丰贸易公司向黄埔海关申报出口一批“耐克”牌运动鞋(美国耐克公司已于2001年向海关总署就“耐克”商标申请过知识产权备案)。申报当天美国耐克(中国)公司称该货物为假冒商品,向黄埔海关申请扣留了该批货物。经过黄埔海关工作人员的查验,宝丰公司的“耐克”运动鞋均为假冒伪劣产品,侵犯了耐克公司的商标专用权,海关依法对该公司进行了处罚,没收了该批货物。 根据上述案例,选择回答 81~85...
A.
“耐克”商标权利人的名称或姓名,注册地或国籍
B.
商标的名称内容及相关信息
C.
该商标的许可行使状况
D.
合法使用该商标的货物名称、产地、进出口商、主要特征等
【判断题】高速公路和一级公路的沥青路面在施工前应铺筑试验段。
A.
正确
B.
错误
【单选题】高速和一级公路沥青路面施工前应铺筑试验段,其长度应根据试验目的确定,通常宜为( )m,宜选在正线上铺筑。
A.
200~300
B.
50~100
C.
100~200
D.
300~500
【单选题】关于创业者应具备的素质和能力,下列说法错误的是:
A.
身体素质
B.
心理素质
C.
诚信
D.
只具备专业方面知识
【单选题】下列关于条件语句的描述中,错误的是
A.
if语句中的条件表达式是一个布尔值。
B.
选择语句分为if条件语句和switch条件语句。
C.
switch语句中的表达式只能是布尔类型的值。
D.
switch语句只能针对某个表达式的值作出判断。
相关题目:
参考解析:
知识点:
题目纠错 0
发布
创建自己的小题库 - 刷刷题