皮皮学,免费搜题
登录
logo - 刷刷题
搜题
【单选题】
(1) Life can be tough for immigrants in America. As a Romanian bank clerk in Atlanta puts it, to find a good job “you have to be like a wolf in the forest – able to smell out the best meat.” And if you can’t find work, don’t expect the taxpayer to bail you out. Unlike in some European countries, it is extremely hard for an able-bodied immigrant to live off the state. A law passed in 1996 explicitly bars most immigrants, even those with legal status, from receiving almost any federal benefits.(2) That is one reason why America absorbs immigrants better than any other rich countries, according to a new study by the University of California. The researchers sought to measure the effect of immigration on the native-born in 20 rich countries, taking into account differences in skills between immigrants and natives, imperfect labor markets and the size of the welfare state in each country.(3) Their results offer ammunition for fans of more open borders. In 19 out of 20 countries, the authors calculated that shutting the doors entirely to foreign workers would make the native-born worse off. Never mind what it would do to the immigrants themselves, who benefit far more than anyone else from being allowed to cross borders to find work.(4) The study also suggests that most countries could handle more immigration than they currently allow. In America, a one-percentage point increase in the proportion of immigrants in the population made the native-born 0.05% better off. The opposite was true in some countries with generous or ill-designed welfare states, however. A one-point rise in immigration made the native-born slightly worse off in Austria, Belgium, Germany, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Sweden and Switzerland. In Belgium, immigrants who lose jobs can receive almost two-thirds of their most recent wage in state benefits, which must make the hunt for a new job less urgent.(5) None of these effects was large, but the study undermines the claim that immigrants steal jobs from native or drag down their wages. Many immigrants take jobs that Americans do not want, the study finds. This “smooths” the labor market and ultimately creates more jobs for locals. Native-owned grocery stores do better business because there are immigrants to pick the fruit they sell. Indian computer scientists help American software firms expand. A previous study found that because immigrants typically earn less than locals with similar skills, they boost corporate profits, prompting companies to grow and hire more locals.1.Increase in immigration in Austria fails to improve locals’ life mainly because of ________.
A.
low wages for locals
B.
imperfect labor markets
C.
the design of the welfare system
D.
inadequate skills of immigrants
手机使用
分享
复制链接
新浪微博
分享QQ
微信扫一扫
微信内点击右上角“…”即可分享
反馈
参考答案:
举一反三
【简答题】使用VC++6.0运行程序program2.4,截图运行结果
【单选题】目前确认与人类肿瘤发生有关的RNA病毒是
A.
人乳头状瘤病毒
B.
乙型肝炎病毒
C.
EB病毒
D.
人类疱疹病毒-8
E.
丙型肝炎病毒
【单选题】焊接时在被焊工件的结合处产生( ),使两分离的工件连为一体。
A.
机械力
B.
原子间结合力
C.
黏结力
D.
A、B和C
【单选题】目前确认与人类肿瘤发生有关的RNA病毒是
A.
人乳头状瘤病毒
B.
丙型肝炎病毒
C.
人类疱疹病毒
D.
乙型肝炎病毒
【简答题】何谓球化退火?为什么过共析钢必须采用球化退火而不采用完全退火?
【单选题】目前确认与人类肿瘤发生有关的RNA病毒是( )
A.
EB病毒
B.
丙型肝炎病毒
C.
乙型肝炎病毒
D.
乳头瘤病毒
【简答题】何谓球化退火?为什么过共析钢必须采用球化退火而不采用完全退火?
【简答题】手术治疗是早期肝癌首选的治疗方法,通过完整的清除肿瘤组织达到治愈的目的。但肝癌早期发现困难,一经发现多数为中晚期,目前以肝动脉化疗栓塞术为主体的介入治疗被公认为不可切除性中晚期肝癌的重要手段。肝动脉化疗栓塞术常用的药物有氟尿嘧啶、多柔比星、表柔比星、丝裂霉素和顺铂等。顺铂是一种常用的金属铂类广谱抗肿瘤药物。关于顺铂,叙述错误的是A、作用机制主要是与DNA有交叉连接而干扰其复制 B、肾毒性大,给药时...
【简答题】何谓球化退火?为什么过共析钢必须采用球化退火而不采用完全退火?
【简答题】使用VC++6.0运行程序program2.3,写出运行结果。
相关题目:
参考解析:
知识点:
题目纠错 0
发布
创建自己的小题库 - 刷刷题