皮皮学,免费搜题
登录
logo - 刷刷题
搜题
【简答题】
Text 2For more than two decades, U.S. courts have been limiting affirmative-action programs in universities and other areas. The legal rationale is that racial preferences are unconstitutional, even those intended to compensate for racism or intolerance. For many colleges, this means students can be admitted only on merit, not on their race or ethnicity. It has been a divisive issue across the U.S., as educators blame the prolonged reaction to affirmative-action for declines in minority admissions. Meanwhile, activists continue to battle race preferences in courts from Michigan to North Carolina. Now, chief executives of about two dozen companies have decided to plunge headfirst into this politically unsettled debate. They, together with 36 universities and 7 nonprofitable organizations, formed a forum that set forth an action plan essentially designed to help colleges circumvent court-imposed restrictions on affirmative action. The CEOs’ motive: “Our audience is growing more diverse, so the communities we serve benefit if our employees are racially and ethnically diverse as well”, says one CEO of a compang that owns nine television stations. Among the steps the forum is pushing: finding creative yet legal ways to boost minority enrollment through new admissions policies promoting admissions decisions that look at more than test scores and encouraging universities to step up their minority outreach and financial aid. And to counter accusations by critics to challenge these tactics in court, the group says it will give legal assistance to colleges sued for trying them. “Diversity diminished by the court must be made up for in other legitimate, legal ways,” says, a forum member. One of the more controversial methods advocated is the so-called 10% rule. The idea is for public universities—which educate three-quarters of all U.S. undergraduates—to admit students who are in the top 10% of their high school graduating class. Doing so allows colleges to take minorities who excel in average urban schools, even if they wouldn’t have made the cut under the current statewide ranking many universities use. 第26题:U.S. court restrictions on affirmative action signifies that______. [A]minorities no longer hold the once favored status [B]the quality of American colleges has improved [C]racial preferences has replaced racial prejudice [D]the minority is on an equal footing with the majority
手机使用
分享
复制链接
新浪微博
分享QQ
微信扫一扫
微信内点击右上角“…”即可分享
反馈
参考答案:
举一反三
【单选题】外交思想中,推动构建人类命运共同体的宗旨是
A.
尊重文化多样、抵制强权政治
B.
关注气候变化、加强全球治理
C.
反对、保障地区安全
D.
维护世界和平、促进共同发展
【单选题】逻辑函数 Y 1 =A ⊕ B 和 Y 2 =A ⊙ B 满足 ( )
A.
Y 1 与 Y 2 互为反函数
B.
Y 1 与 Y 2 互为对偶式
C.
Y 1 与 Y 2 相等
D.
Y 1 与 Y 2 即互反也对偶
【单选题】逻辑函数Y=( (A + B′) (A′+ C) )′A C + B C的Y’ 是()
A.
((A’B+AC’)’+A’+C’)(B’+C’)
B.
(A’B+AC’+A’+C’)(B’+C’)
C.
(A’B+AC’)’+A’+C’(B’+C’)
D.
((A’B+AC’)’+A’+C’)B’+C’
【简答题】将下列逻辑函数化为最小项之和的形式。 (1) Y(A,B,C)=AB'+AC'+B (2) Y(A,B,C)=((A+B)(B'+C'))' (3) Y(A,B,C,D)=AB'D+A'CD+BCD (4) Y(M,N,P,Q)=((M+N+P)Q)'
【单选题】脑脊液中氯化物减低早于葡萄糖减低的疾病是
A.
蛛网膜下腔梗阻
B.
神经梅毒
C.
化脓性脑膜炎
D.
结核性脑膜炎
E.
新型隐球菌性脑膜炎
【简答题】画出表示下列逻辑函数的逻辑图。 (1) Y 1 (A,B,C)=(A+B')(B+C')(A'+C) (2) Y 2 (A,B,C,D)=(A'B'C+AB'D'+AC'D')'+BCD
【单选题】脑脊液中氯化物减低早于葡萄糖减低的 疾病是
A.
蛛网膜下腔梗阻
B.
神经梅毒
C.
化脓性脑膜炎
D.
结核性脑膜炎
E.
新隐球菌性脑膜炎
【简答题】将下列逻辑函数化为最小项之和的形式。 (1) Y(A,B,C)=A'B+B'C (2) Y(A,B,C)=((AB'C)'+C)' (3) Y(P,Q,R,S)=P'R'S+P'QR+Q'R'S (4) Y(A,B,C,D)=A'BCD+ABC'+B'D
【单选题】(年4月25)25.外交思想中,推动构建人类命运共同体的宗旨是
A.
尊重文化多样.抵制强权政治
B.
关注气候变化.加强全球治理
C.
反对.保障地区安全
D.
维护世界和平.促进共同发展
【单选题】山地游玩时选择宿营地不宜:()
A.
避开有滚石和大量堆积物的山坡
B.
选择平整高地作为宿营地
C.
避开陡峭的悬崖和沟壑
D.
在山谷和河底部搭建宿营地
相关题目:
参考解析:
知识点:
题目纠错 0
发布
创建自己的小题库 - 刷刷题