皮皮学,免费搜题
登录
logo - 刷刷题
搜题
【简答题】
Should we allow modern buildings to? be built next to older buildings in a historic area of  a city? In order to answer this question, we must first examine whether people really want to preserve the historic feel of an area. Not all historical buildings are attractive. However, there may be other reasons for example, economic (经济的) reasons-why they should be preserved. So, let us assume that historical buildings are both attractive and important to the majority of people. What should we do then if a new building is needed? In my view, new architectural styles can exist perfectly well alongside an older style. Indeed, there are many examples in my own home town of Tours where modern designs have been placed very successfully next to old buildings. As long as the building in question is pleasing and does not dominate (影响) its surroundings too much, it often improves the attractiveness of the area. It is true that there are examples of new buildings which have spoilt (破坏) the area they are in, but the same can be said of some old buildings too. Yet people still speak against new buildings in historic areas. I think this is simply because people are naturally conservative(保守的)and do not like change. Although we have to respect people's feelings as fellow users of the buildings, I believe that it is the duty of the architect and planner to move things forward . If we always reproduced what was there before,we would all still be living in caves . Thus , I would argue against copying previous architectural styles and choose something fresh and different , even though that might be the more risky choice. 小题1:What does the author say about historical buildings in the first paragraph? A.Some of them are not attractive. B.Most of them ate too expensive to preserve. C.They are more pleasing than modern buildings. D.They have nothing to do with the historic feel of an area. 小题2:Which of the following is true according to the author ? A.We should reproduce the same old buildings. B.Buildings should not dominate their surroundings. C.Some old buildings have spoilt the area they are in. D.No one understands why people speak against new buildings. 小题3:By “move things forward ” in the last paragraph , the author probably means“ ” A.Destroy old buildings B.Put things in a different place C.Choose new architectural styles D.Respect people’s feelings for historical buildings 小题4:What is the main purpose of the passage? A.To explain why people dislike change. B.To warn that we could end up living in caves. C.To admit how new buildings have ruined their surroundings. D.To argue that modern buildings can be built in historic areas.
手机使用
分享
复制链接
新浪微博
分享QQ
微信扫一扫
微信内点击右上角“…”即可分享
反馈
参考答案:
举一反三
【简答题】合金的晶体结构有固溶体和___,其中前者具有良好的塑性,后者具有高的硬度和脆性。
【简答题】The food is insufficient for three people.
【简答题】合金的晶体结构有固溶体和___,其中前者具有良好的塑性,后者具有高的硬度和脆性。
【简答题】合金的晶体结构有___和___,其中前者具有良好的塑性,后者具有高的硬度和脆性。
【判断题】差动连接的单出杆活塞缸,可使活塞实现快速运动。
A.
正确
B.
错误
【判断题】差动连接的单出杆活塞缸,可使活塞实现快速运动
A.
正确
B.
错误
【判断题】差动连接的单出杆活塞液压缸,可使活塞实现快速运动。
A.
正确
B.
错误
【单选题】和上一个10年相比,近10年吸烟者中肺癌患者的比例下降了10%。据分析,这种结果有两个明显的原因:第一,近10年中高档品牌的香烟都带有过滤嘴,这有效地阻止了香烟中有害物质的吸人,第二,和上一个10年相比,近10年吸烟人数大约下降了10%。以下哪项对上述分析的评价最为恰当?
A.
上述分析不存在逻辑漏洞。
B.
上述分析依据的数据有误,因为吸烟者中肺癌患者下降的比例,不可能正好等于吸烟人数下降的比例。
C.
上述分析缺乏说服力,因为显然存在吸过滤嘴香烟的肺癌患者。
D.
上述分析存在漏洞,这种漏洞和以下分析中的类似:人们对航行的恐惧完全是一种心理障碍。统计说明,空难死亡率不到机动车事故死亡率的1%。随着机动车数量的大幅度上升,航空旅行相对地将变得更为安全。
【单选题】和上一个10年相比,近10年吸烟者中肺癌患者的比例下降了10%。据分析,这种结果有两个明显的原因:第一,近10年中高档品牌的香烟都带有过滤嘴,这有效地阻止了香烟中有害物质的吸人;第二,和上一个10年相比,近10年吸烟人数大约下降了10%。 以下哪项对上述分析的评价最为恰当?
A.
上述分析不存在逻辑漏洞。
B.
上述分析依据的数据有误,因为吸烟者中肺癌患者下降的比例,不可能正好等于吸烟人数下降的比例。
C.
上述分析缺乏说服力,因为显然存在吸过滤嘴香烟的肺癌患者。
D.
上述分析存在漏洞,这种漏洞和以下分析中的类似:和去年相比,今年京都大学录取的来自西部新生的比例上升了10%。据分析,这有两个原因:第一,西部地区的中等教育水平逐年提高;第二,今年西部地区的考生比去年增加了10%。
E.
上述分析存在漏洞,这种漏洞和以下分析中的类似:人们对航行的恐惧完全是一种心理障碍。统计说明,空难死亡率不到机动车事故死亡率的1%。随着机动车数量的大幅度上升,航空旅行相对地将变得更为安全。
【判断题】钢焊丝脉冲焊及铝合金熔化极氩弧焊经常用射滴过渡形式。焊钢时总是一滴一滴的过渡,而焊铝及其合金时常常是每次过渡1~2滴。
A.
正确
B.
错误
相关题目:
参考解析:
知识点:
题目纠错 0
发布
创建自己的小题库 - 刷刷题