皮皮学,免费搜题
登录
logo - 刷刷题
搜题
【判断题】
水文科学依靠基本概念和推理逻辑的演绎开展研究。()
A.
正确
B.
错误
手机使用
分享
复制链接
新浪微博
分享QQ
微信扫一扫
微信内点击右上角“…”即可分享
反馈
参考答案:
举一反三
【单选题】关于肾脏描述错误的是()
A.
肾门朝向前内侧
B.
右肾位置较左肾高1~2cm
C.
周围被膜分为三层,依次为纤维囊、脂肪囊和肾筋膜
D.
肾皮质表面由肌织膜包被
E.
分为肾皮质和肾髓质
【简答题】中国新民主主义革命属于世界无产阶级社会主义革命的一部分,具有无产阶级社会主义革命的性质。
【单选题】In which sentence the underlined word has different meaning?
A.
Some hostages were swapped for convicted prisoners.
B.
He put both hands flat on the door and pushed as hard as he could.
C.
The bodyguards thrust past the crowd to get at the cameraman.
D.
He was then shoved face down on the pavement by the policeman.
【多选题】计划审计工作时应当考虑的事项有( )。
A.
企业内部控制最近发生变化的程度
B.
可获取的、与内部控制有效性相关的证据的类型和范围
C.
与企业沟通过的内部控制缺陷
D.
重要性、风险等与确定内部控制重大缺陷相关的因素
【单选题】下列关于肾的描述错误的是
A.
肾蒂由前向后依次为肾静脉、肾动脉和肾盂
B.
肾蒂由上向下依次为肾动脉、肾静脉和肾盂
C.
每个肾锥体及其周围相连的皮质组成一个肾叶
D.
每个肾有7、8个肾大盏
【单选题】根据下面资料,回答下列各题。 Many bankers may be worried about whether some fancy product dreamed up might yet lead to a visit from the police. Daniel Dantas, a financier, who has profited by operating at the middl...
A.
A crime quite experienced and tactful.
B.
A crime by operating at the middle place.
C.
A crime attempting to temper police to work for him.
D.
A crime in money-laundering.
【单选题】关于肾的描述,错误的是
A.
右肾比左肾位置低
B.
右肾前上部为肝右叶
C.
右肾比左肾位置高
D.
是腹膜外位器官
【单选题】In the case of International Primate Protection League vs Institute for Behavioral Research in the US, what of the following s never happened?
A.
In 1981, a graduate student & PETA member, Alex Pacheco, volunteered at a research center in Silver Spring, Maryland. At the time, Edward Taub was conducting research on monkeys for neuroplasticity purposes at that center.
B.
While Alex spent time at the research center, he noticed the inhumane treatment of the monkeys under the AWA and reported it to the police. He filed suit against Edward Taub, who was researching afferent ganglia. Edward Taub was convicted of six animal cruelty charges, which were appealed in the second trial. They proved to be significant in the understanding of the law.
C.
While this case provided an advancement in neurology research, it was at risking inhumane treatment of animals. As the court wrote in its opinion: "To imply a cause of action in these plaintiffs might entail serious consequences. It might open the use of animals in biomedical research to the hazards and vicissitudes of courtroom litigation. It may draw judges into the supervision and regulation of laboratory research. It might unleash a spate of private lawsuits that would impede advances made by medical [sic] science in the alleviation of human suffering. To risk consequences of this magnitude in the absence of clear direction from the Congress would be ill-advised. In fact, we are persuaded that Congress intended that the independence of medical research be respected and that administrative enforcement govern the Animal Welfare Act."
D.
The trial for this case was conducted in the UK.
【单选题】关于肾的描述,错误的是
A.
右肾比左肾低
B.
左肾前上部为胃后壁
C.
右肾前上部为肝右叶
D.
肾上腺位于肾纤维囊之内
E.
是腹膜外位器官
【单选题】Many bankers may be worried about whether some fancy product dreamed up during these years might yet lead to a visit from the police. Daniel Dantas, a financier, who has profited by operating at the o...
A.
A crime quite experienced and tactful.
B.
A crime by operating at the opaque place.
C.
A crime attempting to temper police to work for him.
D.
A crime in money laundering.
相关题目:
【单选题】In the case of International Primate Protection League vs Institute for Behavioral Research in the US, what of the following s never happened?
A.
In 1981, a graduate student & PETA member, Alex Pacheco, volunteered at a research center in Silver Spring, Maryland. At the time, Edward Taub was conducting research on monkeys for neuroplasticity purposes at that center.
B.
While Alex spent time at the research center, he noticed the inhumane treatment of the monkeys under the AWA and reported it to the police. He filed suit against Edward Taub, who was researching afferent ganglia. Edward Taub was convicted of six animal cruelty charges, which were appealed in the second trial. They proved to be significant in the understanding of the law.
C.
While this case provided an advancement in neurology research, it was at risking inhumane treatment of animals. As the court wrote in its opinion: "To imply a cause of action in these plaintiffs might entail serious consequences. It might open the use of animals in biomedical research to the hazards and vicissitudes of courtroom litigation. It may draw judges into the supervision and regulation of laboratory research. It might unleash a spate of private lawsuits that would impede advances made by medical [sic] science in the alleviation of human suffering. To risk consequences of this magnitude in the absence of clear direction from the Congress would be ill-advised. In fact, we are persuaded that Congress intended that the independence of medical research be respected and that administrative enforcement govern the Animal Welfare Act."
D.
The trial for this case was conducted in the UK.
参考解析:
知识点:
题目纠错 0
发布
创建自己的小题库 - 刷刷题