A manager you know converses with you at work and offers this argument: “We interviewed three people for the job. The first person had the strongest resume. The second person seemed a lot friendlier than the other two. I liked the enthusiasm and energy that the third person showed, but that person never worked for an organization like ours before. It’s a tough choice. But I’m thinking that the second person is the one we should hire. We said that innovation was more important for us than experience or enthusiasm." Q: If you take all of the premises as true, is the manager's argument worthy of acceptance?